About Aidatasolutions

A Mong Kok–based practice focused on petty cash audit reviews for Hong Kong businesses.

Why we exist

Petty cash rarely makes the board pack until something goes missing. Aidatasolutions started from a simple observation in Hong Kong offices: imprest floats are counted in a hurry, vouchers pile up in envelopes, and month-end reconciliations get deferred until the difference is awkward. We focus on that narrow problem — petty cash audit reviews — so finance leads can see the float clearly without commissioning a full internal audit project.

Where we work

Our office is at Grand Century Place Tower 1, 193 Prince Edward Road West, Mong Kok, Kowloon. Fieldwork takes us to shops, clinics, kitchens, and site offices across Hong Kong Island, Kowloon, and the New Territories. Document sessions can be held in Mong Kok when the cash itself does not need to move.

How we work

We count with the custodian present. We write exceptions in ordinary language. We do not sell software, dashboards, or vague “control transformation.” A review ends when you have a schedule you can act on — chase a missing receipt, adjust a float limit, or retrain a branch on claim forms.

Who you meet

Engagements are led by practitioners who have spent years walking voucher trails and reconciling imprest accounts for local groups. Junior assistants may help with voucher sorting under supervision; the count observation and exception narrative remain with the engagement lead.

Values that show up on site

  • Respect for the custodian’s time — we schedule around busy service hours when possible.
  • Evidence over assumption — if a voucher is missing, we record that; we do not invent explanations.
  • Proportion — a HKD 2,000 clinic float does not need a bank-audit binder.

Community and clients

We work with family-run shops, mid-size F&B groups, professional firms, and NGOs that still keep a cash tin for small disbursements. If your float is digital-wallet only with no cash, say so at intake — we will tell you honestly if a cash-count review is the wrong fit.